RE: for your comment - a target naming scheme proposal

[haitao.tang@nokia.com]

Carl,

> EXT Carl Friedberg [mailto:friedberg@exs.esb.com] wrote:
> 
> Haitao, here are a few comments:
> 
> (1) expiration date should be January, 2001 (not 2000)
> 
> (2) I think SLoP should also be defined in terminology

Yes, modifications will be made.

> (3) I'm not happy with the first paragraph in the 
> Introduction. Perhaps one
> additional sentence to introduce the scope and purpose of 
> SLoP will help put
> the concept of target in a spatial (e.g. geodesic) perspective.

True, I guess the SLoP requirements I-D will certainly help.

> How about: 
> 
> The SLoP protocol provides spatial and temporal location 
> information of an
> object, called a target. A target is a physical entity in an existing
> space/time reference frame or a logical entity which in turn 
> is hosted by a
> physical entity in an existing space/time reference frame. A 
> target may be
> stationary or in motion.

Yes, it looks better. Modification will be made accordingly.

Thanks.

Haitao